Talk:List of Latin phrases (S)

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

technica impendi nationi

We need a better translation (into English, in my opinion) of "technica impendi nationi." It is currently translated as "technology impulses nations" which is awkward, at best. I've never heard of a nation being "impulsed." Advice from a Latin scholar? Does it mean "technology drives nations?"

66.31.46.97 (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

would like definitions

would like definitions usus loquendi terminus technicus vocabulum artis —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.70.141 (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see ya later aligator

Hi im quite new at this, but I deleted the "see ya later aligator" bit - I really don't think the literal translation - "Goodbye, lizard" was a Latin phrase in use much :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.40.134.129 (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

statim

The link to medical shorthand under the term "statim" is no longer valid, but I'm too lazy to find the proper link.

_______________________________________

Sensus plenior

Can someone add the phrase, "Sensus plenior" please? Stephen Bolin ^talk —Preceding undated comment added 06:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you, Michael Bednarek. --Stephen Bolin ^talk 04:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stercus accidit, attributed to David Hume

A 20th c. catchphrase with an 18th c. Latin antecedent? That hardly seems likely. Varlaam (talk) 00:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be a mock-Latin profanity. The attribution to Hume is indeed highly suspect and I removed it; this might be its origin. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, 4th ed. (1996), doesn't have it. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see, a quotation without citation.

It's good we have our rules around here. Thanks, Varlaam (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sic semper tyrannis

The claimed full version "Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis" appears to have originated on the wiki page for Sic Semper Tyrannis itself from an anonymous edit. The claim that Sic Semper Tyrannis was shortened from anything was removed from that page after no earlier use of "Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis" could be found. As such I've done the same here. Amikefox (talk) 21:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]